How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hungary?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Hungary: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China

0.1952 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Hungary

0.2195 1000 USD per person

in 2024

China rank

13th

Hungary rank

10th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

China
Hungary

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.2195 1000 USD per person against 0.1952 1000 USD per person in China, a difference of 0.0243 1000 USD per person.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

China ranks 13th and Hungary ranks 10th of 133 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Hungary	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0994 1000 USD per person	0.1217 1000 USD per person	0.0224 1000 USD per person	Hungary
1970s	0.1204 1000 USD per person	0.1794 1000 USD per person	0.059 1000 USD per person	Hungary
1980s	0.1442 1000 USD per person	0.2264 1000 USD per person	0.0822 1000 USD per person	Hungary
1990s	0.1562 1000 USD per person	0.1925 1000 USD per person	0.0363 1000 USD per person	Hungary
2000s	0.1439 1000 USD per person	0.2167 1000 USD per person	0.0728 1000 USD per person	Hungary
2010s	0.1787 1000 USD per person	0.2376 1000 USD per person	0.0589 1000 USD per person	Hungary
2020s	0.1905 1000 USD per person	0.2275 1000 USD per person	0.037 1000 USD per person	Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Hungary?: Hungary, at 0.2195 1000 USD per person against 0.1952 1000 USD per person in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Hungary?: 0.0243 1000 USD per person, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hungary?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Hungary rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: China ranks 13th and Hungary ranks 10th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Hungary: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/hungary/">China vs Hungary: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,510 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.