How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Morocco?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile

0.0254 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Morocco

0.0226 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chile rank

98th

Morocco rank

99th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chile
Morocco

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0254 1000 USD per person against 0.0226 1000 USD per person in Morocco, a difference of 0.0028 1000 USD per person.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Chile ranks 98th and Morocco ranks 99th of 133 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.036 1000 USD per person	0.0707 1000 USD per person	0.0347 1000 USD per person	Morocco
1970s	0.031 1000 USD per person	0.0692 1000 USD per person	0.0382 1000 USD per person	Morocco
1980s	0.0334 1000 USD per person	0.0623 1000 USD per person	0.0289 1000 USD per person	Morocco
1990s	0.0361 1000 USD per person	0.0581 1000 USD per person	0.022 1000 USD per person	Morocco
2000s	0.039 1000 USD per person	0.053 1000 USD per person	0.0141 1000 USD per person	Morocco
2010s	0.039 1000 USD per person	0.0619 1000 USD per person	0.0229 1000 USD per person	Morocco
2020s	0.0269 1000 USD per person	0.0376 1000 USD per person	0.0107 1000 USD per person	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Morocco?: Chile, at 0.0254 1000 USD per person against 0.0226 1000 USD per person in Morocco as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Morocco?: 0.0028 1000 USD per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Morocco?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Morocco rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chile ranks 98th and Morocco ranks 99th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/morocco/">Chile vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,510 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.