How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and New Zealand?

56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs New Zealand: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad

0.0574 1000 USD per person

in 2024

New Zealand

0.0583 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chad rank

65th

New Zealand rank

64th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chad
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0583 1000 USD per person against 0.0574 1000 USD per person in Chad, a difference of 0.0009 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 65th and New Zealand ranks 64th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0921 1000 USD per person	0.0531 1000 USD per person	0.0389 1000 USD per person	Chad
1970s	0.0611 1000 USD per person	0.0728 1000 USD per person	0.0117 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1980s	0.0447 1000 USD per person	0.0802 1000 USD per person	0.0355 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
1990s	0.0551 1000 USD per person	0.0686 1000 USD per person	0.0135 1000 USD per person	New Zealand
2000s	0.0631 1000 USD per person	0.0626 1000 USD per person	0.0004 1000 USD per person	Chad
2010s	0.0797 1000 USD per person	0.0638 1000 USD per person	0.0158 1000 USD per person	Chad
2020s	0.0615 1000 USD per person	0.0551 1000 USD per person	0.0064 1000 USD per person	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 0.0583 1000 USD per person against 0.0574 1000 USD per person in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and New Zealand?: 0.0009 1000 USD per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and New Zealand?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and New Zealand rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chad ranks 65th and New Zealand ranks 64th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs New Zealand: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chad/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chad/new-zealand/">Chad vs New Zealand: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,510 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.