Ecuador vs Guinea-Bissau: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
6.89 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
6.21 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
46th
Guinea-Bissau rank
49th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Guinea-Bissau
-40-200204060196219932024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 6.89 % change on previous year against 6.21 % change on previous year in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.68 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 46th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 49th of 196 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 5.21 % change on previous year -6.32 % change on previous year 11.53 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 1.09 % change on previous year 5.98 % change on previous year 4.89 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
1980s 11.78 % change on previous year 7.09 % change on previous year 4.69 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 10.23 % change on previous year 6.48 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 3.44 % change on previous year 6.01 % change on previous year 2.57 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2010s -0.984 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year 3.11 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau
2020s 5.74 % change on previous year 6.01 % change on previous year 0.2728 % change on previous year Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Guinea-Bissau?
Ecuador, at 6.89 % change on previous year against 6.21 % change on previous year in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Guinea-Bissau?
0.68 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guinea-Bissau?
55 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 46th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 49th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Guinea-Bissau: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/guinea-bissau/">Ecuador vs Guinea-Bissau: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 12,508 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.