Eastern Africa vs Sweden: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eastern Africa
0.4694 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
17 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eastern Africa rank
18th
Sweden rank
21st

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eastern Africa
  • Sweden
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 17 % change on previous year against 0.4694 % change on previous year in Eastern Africa, a difference of 16.53 % change on previous year.

That makes Sweden's figure about 36.2 times Eastern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 37 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eastern Africa ahead.

Eastern Africa ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 21st of 30 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eastern Africa averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Africa Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 3.39 % change on previous year 1.9 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year Eastern Africa
1970s 1.36 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year 2.38 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 2.94 % change on previous year 1.7 % change on previous year 1.24 % change on previous year Eastern Africa
1990s 1.41 % change on previous year 0.7439 % change on previous year 0.6694 % change on previous year Eastern Africa
2000s 4.92 % change on previous year 1.51 % change on previous year 3.41 % change on previous year Eastern Africa
2010s 4.38 % change on previous year 6.64 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year Sweden
2020s 2.8 % change on previous year -2.17 % change on previous year 4.96 % change on previous year Eastern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eastern Africa or Sweden?
Sweden, at 17 % change on previous year against 0.4694 % change on previous year in Eastern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eastern Africa and Sweden?
16.53 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eastern Africa and Sweden rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eastern Africa ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 21st of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Africa vs Sweden: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/eastern-africa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/eastern-africa/sweden/">Eastern Africa vs Sweden: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 12,508 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.