Ghana vs Russian Federation: Cereals, other — Feed
Cereals, other — Feed over time
- Ghana
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 620 1000 t against 604 1000 t in Ghana, a difference of 16 1000 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 160 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 62.5 1000 t | 738.6 1000 t | 676.1 1000 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 420 1000 t | 638 1000 t | 218 1000 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals, other — feed, Ghana or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 620 1000 t against 604 1000 t in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals, other — feed between Ghana and Russian Federation?
- 16 1000 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Russian Federation?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Russian Federation rank globally for cereals, other — feed?
- Ghana ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereals, other — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.