Italy vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cereals n.e.c. — Gross Production Value

Italy
22,811 1000 USD
in 2017
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.95 million 1000 USD
in 2024
Italy rank
5th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
5th

Cereals n.e.c. — Gross Production Value over time

  • Italy
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.95 million 1000 USD against 22,811 1000 USD in Italy, a difference of 1.93 million 1000 USD.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 85.7 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 5th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 5th of 44 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 3,307 1000 USD 2,953 1000 USD 354.22 1000 USD Italy
1970s 635.4 1000 USD 4,152 1000 USD 3,517 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 935.2 1000 USD 19,938 1000 USD 19,003 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 3,525 1000 USD 336,431 1000 USD 332,906 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 8,562 1000 USD 785,702 1000 USD 777,140 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 23,340 1000 USD 1.54 million 1000 USD 1.52 million 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals n.e.c. — gross production value, Italy or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.95 million 1000 USD against 22,811 1000 USD in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals n.e.c. — gross production value between Italy and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1.93 million 1000 USD, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Italy and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for cereals n.e.c. — gross production value?
Italy ranks 5th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 5th of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereals n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cereals n.e.c. — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/italy/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/italy/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Italy vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cereals n.e.c. — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
71 places, 3,184 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.