Brazil vs Land locked developing countries: Cereals β Food aid received
Brazil
32,290 t
in 1994
Land locked developing countries
41,748 t
in 2016
Brazil rank
11th
Land locked developing countries rank
5th
Cereals β Food aid received over time
- Brazil
- Land locked developing countries
How they compare
Land locked developing countries currently reports 41,748 t against 32,290 t in Brazil, a difference of 9,458 t.
That makes Land locked developing countries's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Land locked developing countries has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 11th and Land locked developing countries ranks 5th of 108 countries.
Land locked developing countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Land locked developing countries | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 12,219 t | 1.61 million t | 1.60 million t | Land locked developing countries |
| 1990s | 21,769 t | 2.29 million t | 2.27 million t | Land locked developing countries |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals β food aid received, Brazil or Land locked developing countries?
- Land locked developing countries, at 41,748 t against 32,290 t in Brazil as of 2016.
- What is the difference in cereals β food aid received between Brazil and Land locked developing countries?
- 9,458 t, with Land locked developing countries ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Land locked developing countries?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 1994.
- How do Brazil and Land locked developing countries rank globally for cereals β food aid received?
- Brazil ranks 11th and Land locked developing countries ranks 5th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereals β Food aid received. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.