Lesotho vs Malawi: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of GDP
Lesotho
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Malawi
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Lesotho rank
134th
Malawi rank
134th
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of GDP over time
- Lesotho
- Malawi
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 134th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of gdp, Lesotho or Malawi?
- Lesotho, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of gdp between Lesotho and Malawi?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Malawi?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Malawi rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of gdp?
- Lesotho ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 134th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.