Afghanistan vs Spain: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Spain
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
61st
Spain rank
59th
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 61st and Spain ranks 59th of 177 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Spain |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Spain?
- Spain, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Spain?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Spain?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Spain rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 61st and Spain ranks 59th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.