Switzerland vs Uganda: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Switzerland
0.0506 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.0349 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland rank
111th
Uganda rank
113th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Switzerland
  • Uganda
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 0.0506 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0349 tonnes per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0157 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.5 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

Switzerland ranks 111th and Uganda ranks 113th of 178 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5453 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.5453 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 0.4427 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.4427 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 0.7665 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.7665 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 1.15 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0005 tonnes per square kilometre 1.15 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 1.16 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0105 tonnes per square kilometre 1.15 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 0.038 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0289 tonnes per square kilometre 0.009 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 0.0696 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0399 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0297 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Switzerland or Uganda?
Switzerland, at 0.0506 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0349 tonnes per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Switzerland and Uganda?
0.0157 tonnes per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Switzerland and Uganda rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Switzerland ranks 111th and Uganda ranks 113th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Switzerland vs Uganda: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/switzerland/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/switzerland/uganda/">Switzerland vs Uganda: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.