Sweden vs Switzerland: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Sweden
0.0638 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
0.0506 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
109th
Switzerland rank
111th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0638 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0506 tonnes per square kilometre in Switzerland, a difference of 0.0132 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

Sweden ranks 109th and Switzerland ranks 111th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0104 tonnes per square kilometre 0.5453 tonnes per square kilometre 0.535 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 0.0577 tonnes per square kilometre 0.4427 tonnes per square kilometre 0.385 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 0.0722 tonnes per square kilometre 0.7665 tonnes per square kilometre 0.6944 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 0.1097 tonnes per square kilometre 1.15 tonnes per square kilometre 1.04 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 0.0653 tonnes per square kilometre 1.16 tonnes per square kilometre 1.09 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 0.0702 tonnes per square kilometre 0.038 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0323 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0773 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0696 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0077 tonnes per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Sweden or Switzerland?
Sweden, at 0.0638 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0506 tonnes per square kilometre in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Sweden and Switzerland?
0.0132 tonnes per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Switzerland rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Sweden ranks 109th and Switzerland ranks 111th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Switzerland: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/sweden/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/sweden/switzerland/">Sweden vs Switzerland: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.