Sierra Leone vs Zambia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Sierra Leone
0.3048 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.3282 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone rank
83rd
Zambia rank
81st

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Zambia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.3282 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.3048 tonnes per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0234 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 83rd and Zambia ranks 81st of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1970s 0.0139 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0484 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0346 tonnes per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0014 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0014 tonnes per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1990s 0.0194 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0004 tonnes per square kilometre 0.019 tonnes per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2000s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0046 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0046 tonnes per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.9698 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1891 tonnes per square kilometre 0.7807 tonnes per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 0.5819 tonnes per square kilometre 0.3067 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2752 tonnes per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Sierra Leone or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.3282 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.3048 tonnes per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Sierra Leone and Zambia?
0.0234 tonnes per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sierra Leone and Zambia rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Sierra Leone ranks 83rd and Zambia ranks 81st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs Zambia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/zambia/">Sierra Leone vs Zambia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.