Rwanda vs East Timor: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Rwanda
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
136th
East Timor rank
136th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • East Timor
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0 tonnes per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 136th and East Timor ranks 136th of 178 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1970s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1980s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1990s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.8473 tonnes per square kilometre 0.8473 tonnes per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
2010s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
2020s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Rwanda or East Timor?
Rwanda, at 0 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Rwanda and East Timor?
0 tonnes per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and East Timor?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and East Timor rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 136th and East Timor ranks 136th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs East Timor: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/timor-leste/">Rwanda vs East Timor: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.