Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Mozambique
0.0013 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2021
Mozambique rank
133rd
Solomon Islands rank
136th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Solomon Islands
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0013 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0013 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Mozambique ranks 133rd and Solomon Islands ranks 136th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1970s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1980s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1990s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
2000s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0464 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0464 tonnes per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0.0008 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0008 tonnes per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.0032 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0032 tonnes per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Mozambique or Solomon Islands?
Mozambique, at 0.0013 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Mozambique and Solomon Islands?
0.0013 tonnes per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Solomon Islands?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Mozambique and Solomon Islands rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 133rd and Solomon Islands ranks 136th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/solomon-islands/">Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.