South Korea vs Senegal: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

South Korea
4.04 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
3.23 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea rank
29th
Senegal rank
31st

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • South Korea
  • Senegal
012345196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 4.04 tonnes per square kilometre against 3.23 tonnes per square kilometre in Senegal, a difference of 0.81 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 29th and Senegal ranks 31st of 178 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.091 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.091 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea
1970s 0.8117 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0104 tonnes per square kilometre 0.8013 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 0.366 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1875 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1785 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 0.5204 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1039 tonnes per square kilometre 0.4165 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 1.15 tonnes per square kilometre 0.9895 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1588 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 2.68 tonnes per square kilometre 1.31 tonnes per square kilometre 1.37 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 3.69 tonnes per square kilometre 2.93 tonnes per square kilometre 0.7604 tonnes per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, South Korea or Senegal?
South Korea, at 4.04 tonnes per square kilometre against 3.23 tonnes per square kilometre in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between South Korea and Senegal?
0.81 tonnes per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Senegal rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
South Korea ranks 29th and Senegal ranks 31st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Senegal: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/senegal/">South Korea vs Senegal: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.