Kiribati vs South Africa: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2018
South Africa
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2021
Kiribati rank
136th
South Africa rank
136th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • South Africa
01234196119912021

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Kiribati ranks 136th and South Africa ranks 136th of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0472 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0472 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 1.11 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1205 tonnes per square kilometre 0.9906 tonnes per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 1.23 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1224 tonnes per square kilometre 1.11 tonnes per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 1.23 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0841 tonnes per square kilometre 1.15 tonnes per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 2.47 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2005 tonnes per square kilometre 2.27 tonnes per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0015 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0015 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Kiribati or South Africa?
Kiribati, at 0 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2018.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Kiribati and South Africa?
0 tonnes per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Africa?
54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
How do Kiribati and South Africa rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 136th and South Africa ranks 136th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs South Africa: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/south-africa/">Kiribati vs South Africa: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.