Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.0093 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.0084 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
124th
Saudi Arabia rank
125th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Saudi Arabia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0093 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0084 tonnes per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0009 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Guatemala ranks 124th and Saudi Arabia ranks 125th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0052 tonnes per square kilometre 0.002 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0032 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.0103 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0033 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0069 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.1138 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1138 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0019 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0002 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0017 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0024 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0024 tonnes per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0019 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0127 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0108 tonnes per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.007 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0095 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0025 tonnes per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Saudi Arabia?
Guatemala, at 0.0093 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0084 tonnes per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Saudi Arabia?
0.0009 tonnes per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Saudi Arabia rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 124th and Saudi Arabia ranks 125th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/saudi-arabia/">Guatemala vs Saudi Arabia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.