Dominican Republic vs Zambia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
0.332 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.3282 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
80th
Zambia rank
81st

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Zambia
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.332 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.3282 tonnes per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0038 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 80th and Zambia ranks 81st of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —
1970s 0.0145 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0484 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0339 tonnes per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0517 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0517 tonnes per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 0.0994 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0004 tonnes per square kilometre 0.099 tonnes per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.207 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0046 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2024 tonnes per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.3665 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1891 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1773 tonnes per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.4201 tonnes per square kilometre 0.3067 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1134 tonnes per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Zambia?
Dominican Republic, at 0.332 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.3282 tonnes per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Zambia?
0.0038 tonnes per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Zambia rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 80th and Zambia ranks 81st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Zambia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/zambia/">Dominican Republic vs Zambia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.