Bermuda vs Macao: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Bermuda
55.56 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2009
Macao
67.8 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2009
Bermuda rank
3rd
Macao rank
2nd

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Macao
0100200300196119852009

How they compare

Macao currently reports 67.8 tonnes per square kilometre against 55.56 tonnes per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 12.24 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times Bermuda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Macao ahead.

Bermuda ranks 3rd and Macao ranks 2nd of 178 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Macao Difference Ahead
1960s 18.52 tonnes per square kilometre 38.89 tonnes per square kilometre 20.37 tonnes per square kilometre Macao
1970s 27.78 tonnes per square kilometre 25 tonnes per square kilometre 2.78 tonnes per square kilometre Bermuda
1980s 33.33 tonnes per square kilometre 50 tonnes per square kilometre 16.67 tonnes per square kilometre Macao
1990s 18.52 tonnes per square kilometre 50 tonnes per square kilometre 31.48 tonnes per square kilometre Macao
2000s 27.78 tonnes per square kilometre 120.38 tonnes per square kilometre 92.6 tonnes per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Bermuda or Macao?
Macao, at 67.8 tonnes per square kilometre against 55.56 tonnes per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2009.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Bermuda and Macao?
12.24 tonnes per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Macao?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2009.
How do Bermuda and Macao rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 3rd and Macao ranks 2nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Macao: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/macao-sar-china/">Bermuda vs Macao: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.