Belize vs French Polynesia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Belize
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
0 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
136th
French Polynesia rank
136th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Belize
  • French Polynesia
0246196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Belize ranks 136th and French Polynesia ranks 136th of 178 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0438 tonnes per square kilometre 0.9715 tonnes per square kilometre 0.9276 tonnes per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.0438 tonnes per square kilometre 1.31 tonnes per square kilometre 1.27 tonnes per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.057 tonnes per square kilometre 1.78 tonnes per square kilometre 1.72 tonnes per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.1184 tonnes per square kilometre 3.03 tonnes per square kilometre 2.91 tonnes per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.171 tonnes per square kilometre 5.27 tonnes per square kilometre 5.1 tonnes per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.0395 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1441 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1046 tonnes per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre 0 tonnes per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Belize or French Polynesia?
Belize, at 0 tonnes per square kilometre against 0 tonnes per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Belize and French Polynesia?
0 tonnes per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and French Polynesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and French Polynesia rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Belize ranks 136th and French Polynesia ranks 136th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs French Polynesia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/belize/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/belize/french-polynesia/">Belize vs French Polynesia: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.