Australia vs New Zealand: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre

Australia
0.1382 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.1937 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
98th
New Zealand rank
95th

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1937 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.1382 tonnes per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0555 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 95th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0109 tonnes per square kilometre 0.011 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0001 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.0209 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0137 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0072 tonnes per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0258 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0292 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0035 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0497 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0475 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0022 tonnes per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0871 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1398 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0526 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.1248 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2453 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1205 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.1289 tonnes per square kilometre 0.2336 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1046 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre, Australia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.1937 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.1382 tonnes per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre between Australia and New Zealand?
0.0555 tonnes per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 98th and New Zealand ranks 95th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Zealand: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/australia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-allocated-to-food-animal-feed-and-fuel-per-square-kilometre/australia/new-zealand/">Australia vs New Zealand: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,362 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.