Ecuador vs Qatar: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita
Ecuador
0.0017 tonnes per person
in 2023
Qatar
0.0015 tonnes per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
98th
Qatar rank
100th
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Qatar
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0017 tonnes per person against 0.0015 tonnes per person in Qatar, a difference of 0.0002 tonnes per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 98th and Qatar ranks 100th of 178 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.01 tonnes per person | 0.0011 tonnes per person | 0.0088 tonnes per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0043 tonnes per person | 0.0015 tonnes per person | 0.0028 tonnes per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita, Ecuador or Qatar?
- Ecuador, at 0.0017 tonnes per person against 0.0015 tonnes per person in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita between Ecuador and Qatar?
- 0.0002 tonnes per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Qatar rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 98th and Qatar ranks 100th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.