Ecuador vs Libya: Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita
Ecuador
0.0017 tonnes per person
in 2023
Libya
0.0025 tonnes per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
98th
Libya rank
95th
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.0025 tonnes per person against 0.0017 tonnes per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0008 tonnes per person.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 98th and Libya ranks 95th of 178 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0222 tonnes per person | 0.0311 tonnes per person | 0.0089 tonnes per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0043 tonnes per person | 0.0073 tonnes per person | 0.003 tonnes per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita, Ecuador or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.0025 tonnes per person against 0.0017 tonnes per person in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita between Ecuador and Libya?
- 0.0008 tonnes per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Libya rank globally for cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 98th and Libya ranks 95th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereals allocated to food, animal feed and fuel divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.