Malawi vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Malawi
0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
10th

Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Malawi
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0000.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 4.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 10th of 178 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0008 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0006 metric tons per US$ of GDP Malawi
1990s 0.0006 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0004 metric tons per US$ of GDP Malawi
2000s 0.0005 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP Malawi
2010s 0.0004 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP Malawi
2020s 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Malawi or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Malawi, at 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Malawi and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Malawi ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 10th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/malawi/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/malawi/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Malawi vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.