Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Tanzania: Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tanzania
0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
15th
Tanzania rank
17th

Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Tanzania
0000.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 3.0 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0006 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0005 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1990s 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0005 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2010s 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2020s 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Tanzania?
0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Tanzania?
37 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Tanzania rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Tanzania: Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/tanzania/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Tanzania: Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.