Cambodia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Cambodia
0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cambodia rank
4th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
7th

Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Cambodia
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922024

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 4.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 4th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th of 178 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0014 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0004 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Cambodia
1980s 0.0019 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0016 metric tons per US$ of GDP Cambodia
1990s 0.0011 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0008 metric tons per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2000s 0.0009 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0006 metric tons per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2010s 0.0005 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2020s 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Cambodia or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Cambodia, at 0.0003 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Cambodia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
0.0002 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Cambodia ranks 4th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Cambodia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.