Ethiopia vs Sierra Leone: Cereal production index
Cereal production index over time
- Ethiopia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 143.81 1999-2001 = 100 against 141.42 1999-2001 = 100 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 2.39 1999-2001 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 14th and Sierra Leone ranks 16th of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.73 1999-2001 = 100 | 49.13 1999-2001 = 100 | 9.6 1999-2001 = 100 | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 90.34 1999-2001 = 100 | 74.67 1999-2001 = 100 | 15.68 1999-2001 = 100 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 134.99 1999-2001 = 100 | 138.28 1999-2001 = 100 | 3.29 1999-2001 = 100 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal production index, Ethiopia or Sierra Leone?
- Ethiopia, at 143.81 1999-2001 = 100 against 141.42 1999-2001 = 100 in Sierra Leone as of 2011.
- What is the difference in cereal production index between Ethiopia and Sierra Leone?
- 2.39 1999-2001 = 100, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Sierra Leone?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Ethiopia and Sierra Leone rank globally for cereal production index?
- Ethiopia ranks 14th and Sierra Leone ranks 16th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Cereal production index (1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereal production index covers cereals that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed.