Chad vs Djibouti: Cereal production index
Cereal production index over time
- Chad
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 140.8 1999-2001 = 100 against 138.52 1999-2001 = 100 in Chad, a difference of 2.28 1999-2001 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Djibouti ahead.
Chad ranks 20th and Djibouti ranks 18th of 51 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Djibouti in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 31.52 1999-2001 = 100 | 68.94 1999-2001 = 100 | 37.41 1999-2001 = 100 | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 55.74 1999-2001 = 100 | 104.25 1999-2001 = 100 | 48.52 1999-2001 = 100 | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 98.42 1999-2001 = 100 | 108.97 1999-2001 = 100 | 10.55 1999-2001 = 100 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 136.09 1999-2001 = 100 | 135.66 1999-2001 = 100 | 0.435 1999-2001 = 100 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal production index, Chad or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 140.8 1999-2001 = 100 against 138.52 1999-2001 = 100 in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in cereal production index between Chad and Djibouti?
- 2.28 1999-2001 = 100, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Djibouti?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Djibouti rank globally for cereal production index?
- Chad ranks 20th and Djibouti ranks 18th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Cereal production index (1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereal production index covers cereals that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed.