Luxembourg vs Malta: Share of cereals allocated to food, animal feed or fuel
Luxembourg
90,000 tonnes
in 2023
Malta
104,000 tonnes
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
166th
Malta rank
163rd
Share of cereals allocated to food, animal feed or fuel over time
- Luxembourg
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 104,000 tonnes against 90,000 tonnes in Luxembourg, a difference of 14,000 tonnes.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 166th and Malta ranks 163rd of 192 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49,100 tonnes | 63,400 tonnes | 14,300 tonnes | Malta |
| 2010s | 74,600 tonnes | 80,900 tonnes | 6,300 tonnes | Malta |
| 2020s | 87,250 tonnes | 97,500 tonnes | 10,250 tonnes | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of cereals allocated to food, animal feed or fuel, Luxembourg or Malta?
- Malta, at 104,000 tonnes against 90,000 tonnes in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of cereals allocated to food, animal feed or fuel between Luxembourg and Malta?
- 14,000 tonnes, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malta?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Malta rank globally for share of cereals allocated to food, animal feed or fuel?
- Luxembourg ranks 166th and Malta ranks 163rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of cereals allocated to food, animal feed or fuel. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is allocated for direct consumption as human food, rather than allocation to animal feed or industrial uses.