Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Stocks, per capita
Turkmenistan
0.3396 An per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.3452 An per person
in 2024
Turkmenistan rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
29th
Cattle — Stocks, per capita over time
- Turkmenistan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.3452 An per person against 0.3396 An per person in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0056 An per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Turkmenistan ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2532 An per person | 0.4649 An per person | 0.2117 An per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.3781 An per person | 0.4378 An per person | 0.0597 An per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.3736 An per person | 0.3905 An per person | 0.0169 An per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.3495 An per person | 0.3446 An per person | 0.0049 An per person | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — stocks, per capita, Turkmenistan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.3452 An per person against 0.3396 An per person in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cattle — stocks, per capita between Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0056 An per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — stocks, per capita?
- Turkmenistan ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.