El Salvador vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate

El Salvador
3.18 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
3.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador rank
30th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
32nd

Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate over time

  • El Salvador
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-20-100102030196219932024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 3.18 % change on previous year against 3.01 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.17 % change on previous year.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

El Salvador ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 32nd of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9996 % change on previous year 2.76 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 1.53 % change on previous year 2.25 % change on previous year 0.7184 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s -1.36 % change on previous year 0.4872 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 0.0513 % change on previous year 3.35 % change on previous year 3.3 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 1.83 % change on previous year 1.04 % change on previous year 0.7879 % change on previous year El Salvador
2010s -5.66 % change on previous year 5.36 % change on previous year 11.02 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 2.1 % change on previous year 4 % change on previous year 1.9 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — stocks, annual growth rate, El Salvador or United Republic of Tanzania?
El Salvador, at 3.18 % change on previous year against 3.01 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in cattle — stocks, annual growth rate between El Salvador and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.17 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — stocks, annual growth rate?
El Salvador ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks-annual-growth-rate/el-salvador/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-stocks-annual-growth-rate/el-salvador/united-republic-of-tanzania/">El Salvador vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,590 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Stocks. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.