Gambia vs Latvia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP
Gambia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Gambia rank
82nd
Latvia rank
83rd
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Gambia
- Latvia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Gambia ranks 82nd and Latvia ranks 83rd of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp, Gambia or Latvia?
- Gambia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp between Gambia and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Gambia and Latvia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per unit of gdp?
- Gambia ranks 82nd and Latvia ranks 83rd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.