Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Rwanda
0.0459 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.055 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
34th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.055 t per square kilometre against 0.0459 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0091 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0042 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.0104 t per square kilometre 0.0072 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0157 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0099 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0155 t per square kilometre 0.0358 t per square kilometre 0.0203 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0303 t per square kilometre 0.0417 t per square kilometre 0.0113 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0368 t per square kilometre 0.0472 t per square kilometre 0.0104 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0464 t per square kilometre 0.0516 t per square kilometre 0.0053 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.055 t per square kilometre against 0.0459 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
0.0091 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/zimbabwe/">Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.