Romania vs Uganda: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Romania
0.0236 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Uganda
0.0234 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
53rd
Uganda rank
54th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Romania
  • Uganda
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0236 t per square kilometre against 0.0234 t per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 53rd and Uganda ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0392 t per square kilometre 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0328 t per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0541 t per square kilometre 0.0085 t per square kilometre 0.0456 t per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0488 t per square kilometre 0.0081 t per square kilometre 0.0406 t per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0482 t per square kilometre 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.0391 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0347 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0201 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0256 t per square kilometre 0.0207 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Romania or Uganda?
Romania, at 0.0236 t per square kilometre against 0.0234 t per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2017.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Romania and Uganda?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uganda?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Romania and Uganda rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Romania ranks 53rd and Uganda ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Uganda: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/romania/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/romania/uganda/">Romania vs Uganda: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.