Cuba vs Romania: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0229 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0236 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Cuba rank
55th
Romania rank
53rd

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Romania
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0236 t per square kilometre against 0.0229 t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0007 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 55th and Romania ranks 53rd of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0551 t per square kilometre 0.0392 t per square kilometre 0.016 t per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0507 t per square kilometre 0.0541 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0492 t per square kilometre 0.0488 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0251 t per square kilometre 0.0482 t per square kilometre 0.0232 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0199 t per square kilometre 0.0347 t per square kilometre 0.0148 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0234 t per square kilometre 0.0256 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Cuba or Romania?
Romania, at 0.0236 t per square kilometre against 0.0229 t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2017.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Cuba and Romania?
0.0007 t per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Cuba and Romania rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 55th and Romania ranks 53rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Romania: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/cuba/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/cuba/romania/">Cuba vs Romania: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.