Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0583 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.055 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
34th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0583 t per square kilometre against 0.055 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0033 t per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.052 t per square kilometre 0.0391 t per square kilometre 0.0129 t per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0387 t per square kilometre 0.0417 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.049 t per square kilometre 0.0472 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0547 t per square kilometre 0.0516 t per square kilometre 0.0031 t per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Belarus, at 0.0583 t per square kilometre against 0.055 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
0.0033 t per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.