Estonia vs Namibia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita
Estonia
0.0003 t per person
in 2017
Namibia
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Estonia rank
56th
Namibia rank
59th
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita over time
- Estonia
- Namibia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 56th and Namibia ranks 59th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0 t per person | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita, Estonia or Namibia?
- Estonia, at 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Namibia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita between Estonia and Namibia?
- 0 t per person, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Estonia and Namibia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita?
- Estonia ranks 56th and Namibia ranks 59th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.