Czechia vs Mongolia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita
Czechia
0.0008 t per person
in 2017
Mongolia
0.0009 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
27th
Mongolia rank
25th
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0009 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Czechia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 167 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.001 t per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita, Czechia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.0009 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita between Czechia and Mongolia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mongolia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Mongolia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.