Czechia vs Ecuador: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita
Czechia
0.0008 t per person
in 2017
Ecuador
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
27th
Ecuador rank
30th
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 27th and Ecuador ranks 30th of 167 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita, Czechia or Ecuador?
- Czechia, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Ecuador as of 2017.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita between Czechia and Ecuador?
- 0 t per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ecuador?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Ecuador rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 27th and Ecuador ranks 30th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.