Croatia vs Latvia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita
Croatia
0.0006 t per person
in 2017
Latvia
0.0005 t per person
in 2017
Croatia rank
42nd
Latvia rank
45th
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Croatia ranks 42nd and Latvia ranks 45th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita, Croatia or Latvia?
- Croatia, at 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Latvia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita between Croatia and Latvia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 42nd and Latvia ranks 45th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.