Chile vs Estonia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita
Chile
0.0003 t per person
in 2024
Estonia
0.0003 t per person
in 2017
Chile rank
57th
Estonia rank
56th
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita over time
- Chile
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Chile, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Chile ranks 57th and Estonia ranks 56th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0 t per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0 t per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita, Chile or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0.0003 t per person against 0.0003 t per person in Chile as of 2017.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita between Chile and Estonia?
- 0 t per person, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Estonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Estonia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per capita?
- Chile ranks 57th and Estonia ranks 56th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.