Singapore vs Solomon Islands: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Singapore
0.1184 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.1486 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
157th
Solomon Islands rank
155th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Singapore
  • Solomon Islands
051015196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.1486 An per square kilometre against 0.1184 An per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0302 An per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 157th and Solomon Islands ranks 155th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 8.81 An per square kilometre 0.0443 An per square kilometre 8.77 An per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 5.26 An per square kilometre 0.1383 An per square kilometre 5.13 An per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 2.17 An per square kilometre 0.1567 An per square kilometre 2.01 An per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 1.08 An per square kilometre 0.1179 An per square kilometre 0.9646 An per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.1752 An per square kilometre 0.1318 An per square kilometre 0.0434 An per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.1427 An per square kilometre 0.145 An per square kilometre 0.0022 An per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.1187 An per square kilometre 0.1475 An per square kilometre 0.0287 An per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Singapore or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.1486 An per square kilometre against 0.1184 An per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Singapore and Solomon Islands?
0.0302 An per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Solomon Islands rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Singapore ranks 157th and Solomon Islands ranks 155th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Solomon Islands: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/singapore/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/singapore/solomon-islands/">Singapore vs Solomon Islands: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.