Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Papua New Guinea
0.0474 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0503 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
163rd
Suriname rank
162nd

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Suriname
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0503 An per square kilometre against 0.0474 An per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0029 An per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 163rd and Suriname ranks 162nd of 167 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0136 An per square kilometre 0.0425 An per square kilometre 0.0289 An per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0311 An per square kilometre 0.0482 An per square kilometre 0.0172 An per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0315 An per square kilometre 0.0539 An per square kilometre 0.0224 An per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0347 An per square kilometre 0.0899 An per square kilometre 0.0551 An per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0454 An per square kilometre 0.0628 An per square kilometre 0.0175 An per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0474 An per square kilometre 0.0593 An per square kilometre 0.0119 An per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0471 An per square kilometre 0.0537 An per square kilometre 0.0066 An per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Papua New Guinea or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0503 An per square kilometre against 0.0474 An per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
0.0029 An per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Suriname rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Papua New Guinea ranks 163rd and Suriname ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/suriname/">Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.