Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Costa Rica
7.37 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7.09 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
29th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Zimbabwe
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 7.37 An per square kilometre against 7.09 An per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.28 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.99 An per square kilometre 0.8753 An per square kilometre 2.11 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 5.83 An per square kilometre 1.57 An per square kilometre 4.26 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 7.86 An per square kilometre 1.17 An per square kilometre 6.68 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 8.27 An per square kilometre 6.17 An per square kilometre 2.1 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 6.73 An per square kilometre 6.86 An per square kilometre 0.136 An per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 7.32 An per square kilometre 7.12 An per square kilometre 0.2043 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 7.64 An per square kilometre 6.65 An per square kilometre 0.9864 An per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
Costa Rica, at 7.37 An per square kilometre against 7.09 An per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
0.28 An per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Costa Rica ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/zimbabwe/">Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.