Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Chile
0.9738 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.9846 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
115th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
114th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Chile
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.9846 An per square kilometre against 0.9738 An per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0108 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Chile ranks 115th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 114th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8325 An per square kilometre 2.11 An per square kilometre 1.28 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.8487 An per square kilometre 1.93 An per square kilometre 1.09 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 1.03 An per square kilometre 2.42 An per square kilometre 1.39 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 1.32 An per square kilometre 2.26 An per square kilometre 0.9406 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1.19 An per square kilometre 2.41 An per square kilometre 1.22 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 1.09 An per square kilometre 1.16 An per square kilometre 0.068 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 1.06 An per square kilometre 0.9202 An per square kilometre 0.1385 An per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Chile or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.9846 An per square kilometre against 0.9738 An per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0108 An per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Chile ranks 115th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/chile/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/chile/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.