Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.7821 An per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.7693 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
127th
New Caledonia rank
128th

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Caledonia
123196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.7821 An per square kilometre against 0.7693 An per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0128 An per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and New Caledonia ranks 128th of 167 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.23 An per square kilometre 1.22 An per square kilometre 1.02 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 2.67 An per square kilometre 1.06 An per square kilometre 1.61 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.87 An per square kilometre 0.9169 An per square kilometre 0.9546 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.9332 An per square kilometre 0.7789 An per square kilometre 0.1543 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.7821 An per square kilometre against 0.7693 An per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
0.0128 An per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and New Caledonia ranks 128th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-caledonia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.