Barbados vs Zambia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Barbados
1.91 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.93 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
92nd
Zambia rank
91st

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Zambia
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.93 An per square kilometre against 1.91 An per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.02 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 91st of 167 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 6.34 An per square kilometre 0.1825 An per square kilometre 6.16 An per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 5.94 An per square kilometre 0.2178 An per square kilometre 5.73 An per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 5.87 An per square kilometre 0.2655 An per square kilometre 5.6 An per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 9.83 An per square kilometre 0.4459 An per square kilometre 9.39 An per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 3.76 An per square kilometre 0.5522 An per square kilometre 3.21 An per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 1.87 An per square kilometre 1.48 An per square kilometre 0.3855 An per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 2.01 An per square kilometre 1.62 An per square kilometre 0.3876 An per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Barbados or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.93 An per square kilometre against 1.91 An per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Barbados and Zambia?
0.02 An per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zambia rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Barbados ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 91st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zambia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/barbados/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/barbados/zambia/">Barbados vs Zambia: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.