Angola vs Antigua and Barbuda: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square

Angola
0.5106 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda
0.5659 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
135th
Antigua and Barbuda rank
133rd

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square over time

  • Angola
  • Antigua and Barbuda
02468196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.5659 An per square kilometre against 0.5106 An per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0553 An per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 135th and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 133rd of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Antigua and Barbuda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1438 An per square kilometre 2.5 An per square kilometre 2.36 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.2346 An per square kilometre 3.47 An per square kilometre 3.23 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.2899 An per square kilometre 6.29 An per square kilometre 6 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.3251 An per square kilometre 3.21 An per square kilometre 2.89 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.4071 An per square kilometre 2.12 An per square kilometre 1.72 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.4885 An per square kilometre 1.55 An per square kilometre 1.06 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.5034 An per square kilometre 0.8063 An per square kilometre 0.3029 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square, Angola or Antigua and Barbuda?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.5659 An per square kilometre against 0.5106 An per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square between Angola and Antigua and Barbuda?
0.0553 An per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Antigua and Barbuda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Antigua and Barbuda rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, per square?
Angola ranks 135th and Antigua and Barbuda ranks 133rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Antigua and Barbuda: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/angola/antigua-and-barbuda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-fat-unrendered-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/angola/antigua-and-barbuda/">Angola vs Antigua and Barbuda: Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.