Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth
Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11.16 % change on previous year against 0.3792 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 10.78 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 29.4 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 18th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.77 % change on previous year | 2.71 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 5.92 % change on previous year | 1.65 % change on previous year | 4.27 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -2.82 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | 4.01 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | 2 % change on previous year | 1.67 % change on previous year | 0.3262 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | -0.2154 % change on previous year | 2.21 % change on previous year | 2.43 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.22 % change on previous year | 2.35 % change on previous year | 1.13 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 0.209 % change on previous year | 1.49 % change on previous year | 1.29 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, annual growth, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 11.16 % change on previous year against 0.3792 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, annual growth between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 10.78 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for cattle fat, unrendered — producing animals/slaughtered, annual growth?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 18th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.